Sovereignty , Autonomy and Conditional Spending
نویسنده
چکیده
One of the most conspicuous features of the Rehnquist era has been the revival of the concept of enumerated powers as an important theme in constitutional jurisprudence. In the period from 1937 through 1995, the Court routinely concluded that the Commerce Clause granted the federal government power to regulate private activities which were traditionally relegated to local control. However, in United States v. Lopez and United States v. Morrison, a majority of the Court concluded that federal power under the Commerce Clause was subject to significant limitations. By their nature, the decisions in Lopez and Morrison called into question the scope of other enumerated powers as well. One of the most important issues is raised by cases of “conditional” spending—situations in which Congress seeks to extend the reach of its authority by imposing conditions on states’ receipt of federal funds. The early Rehnquist Court decision in South Dakota v. Dole suggested that Congress had broad authority to use this device to achieve its objectives. However, some have argued that Lopez and Morrison implicitly undermine the premises on which Dole was founded. Rather than focusing on the specific reasoning of Lopez and Morrison, this article will measure the constitutionality of conditional spending against basic principles of constitutional interpretation. The article will first briefly summarize the decision in Dole itself. The article will then observe that the spending power by its terms is plenary, and that there is no direct evidence which suggests that the framers considered the issue of conditional spend-
منابع مشابه
Explaining the Demand for Sovereignty
Why do groups want to secede and where are we most likely to see demands for self-determination? We propose an economic explanation whereby a tradeoff between income and sovereignty implies that, other things being equal, richer regions are more likely to want more autonomy and conflict arises due to a disparity between desired and actual levels of sovereignty. We provide simple empirical tests...
متن کاملComparative Political Studies
Why do groups want to secede and where is demand for self-determination most likely to arise? We argue self-determination demand is moderated by the projected economic costs of policy autonomy. The trade-off between income and sovereignty implies that, other things being equal, richer regions are more likely to demand more autonomy. This trade-off suggests that relative regional income is a key...
متن کاملHuman Rights, Autonomy and National Sovereignty
This paper examines the legal and ethical problems involved in reconciling two separate rights, each of which plays a fundamental role in the current philosophical debate surrounding international relations and international law: the right to national sovereignty to which many states lay claim, on the one hand, and the right to selfdetermination, on the other. Refusal to grant the right of self...
متن کاملDifferent Roads to Home: the retrocession of Hong Kong and Macau to Chinese sovereignty
The retrocession to Chinese sovereignty of Hong Kong in 1997 and Macau in 1999 have been milestones in the PRC’s national reunification drive. While these two South China coast enclaves share many similarities under Western colonial rule, their homecoming to China was markedly different in several key dimensions. HK’s contested sovereignty and democratization mired Sino–British cooperation over...
متن کامل